Text
Kinerja Mediator Hubungan Industrila Sebelum dan Sesudah Ditetapkan Permen PANRB Nomor 17 Tahun 2021
Guidance, development and resolution of industrial relations conflicts outside the court are the responsibility of the mediator in the process of resolving labor disputes. The purpose of this study is to find out how the performance of the Industrial Relations Mediators of the Ministry of Manpower compares before and after PANRB Regulation Number 17 of 2021 applies. This research is qualitative in nature. In this investigation, 16 informants participated. In terms of data analysis for this study, Miles & Huberman (1984) are responsible. Based on the findings of the study, PANRB Regulation Number 17 of 2021 concerning the equalization of administrative positions to functional positions cannot be said to have a full positive impact on the results of the evaluation of the performance of the Industrial Relations Mediator of the Ministry of Manpower. With a percentage of 68.75% of 11 informants, the indication of the quantity of ASN or PNS work is considered constant, indicating that the workload is in accordance with that of ASN. According to 11 informants, indications of work discipline have increased by 68.75% indicating that work discipline is going well. According to 14 informants, the indicators for the accuracy of tasks completed by ASNs grew by a percentage of 87.5%, indicating that they had carried out their role very well as mediators for the Ministry of Industrial Relations. Indications of honesty were reported consistently with the percentage of 56.25% of 9 informants, so that in the performance of mediators honesty is still highly respected and becomes a crucial factor in completing tasks.. However, in this case there are performance indicators that need to be considered, namely indicators of the quality of work carried out by ASNs which are said to have decreased by 75% from 12 informants, so the quality of work has not been maximized due to a lack of ability and understanding of ASNs in carrying out the tasks assigned. The efficiency indicator in carrying out mediation is said to have decreased with a percentage of 81.25% from 13 informants, so ASN is still not able to make their work efficient properly. The initiative indicator is said to have decreased with a percentage of 87.5% from 14 informants, so the implementation is still not optimal. The leadership indicator is said to have decreased with a percentage of 87.5% of the 14 informants, so in the implementation of the mediator's performance there was still a lack of optimality in providing direction and guidance to employees. On the creativity indicator it is said that it has decreased with a percentage of 81.25% of the 13 informants, so the mediator does not yet have creativity or is said to be still minimal in showing creativity
TES23/042 | TES 23/042 | Prodi Magister Manajemen | Tersedia |
Tidak tersedia versi lain